The list is twofold. The top part shows those who have stated that they want to remove criminal thr

This survey department stores in nyc was made on the basis that I received so many inquiries before the general election department stores in nyc in 2013 with the question of "who really mean it?", Having made a similar list for the municipal elections in 2011. The first track of what was in the parties' programs I created in 2007. I have chosen to include statements not only from the local government and parliamentary representatives, for example, leaders of youth parties quickly rise through the ranks.
The list is twofold. The top part shows those who have stated that they want to remove criminal threat to private use and possession and legalize / regulate it today illicit drug market. For cannabis, it will mean the same as for the regulation of alcohol.
Those who stated that they would "decriminalize" and / or "alternative sanctions" (without punishment threat is removed) are either not been set or is set to "shame list". It also applies to those who would "legalize cannabis" only for a small group of sick people, but expressed in a way that gives the impression that the criminal threat to be removed similar department stores in nyc to that of alcohol. The terms "alternative sanctions" and a "medical scheme for a few" may be a discrepancy between what is said in the media and what is promoted by policy proposals.
Doing private use and possession "minor offense", for example by changing the law from fine to fine, is not a real decriminalization, but the "decriminalization" (de-/nedkriminalisering). department stores in nyc As long as it is a criminal offense will still be able to be punished. For there to be a real decriminalization must clearly appear that the criminal threat is removed.
"Decriminalization" with "alternative sanctions" removes nor criminal threat. Many believe that the "voluntary" treatment under threat of punishment is even more punishment.
When talking about legalization means that the authorities in some way involved in both production (or import) and sales. State Controlled is not necessarily department stores in nyc the same as government produced. Distinction must be made between drugs, cannabis and heroin must legally be made and regulated in different department stores in nyc ways. For cannabis sales can be clean state, privatized or a combination (it's blah. Regarding department stores in nyc who should have (a majority) of the proceeds from the sale). As for alcohol, it may also be allowed home cultivation for personal use and cafes ala microbreweries).
"Legalize / legalization" means to legally do, but it does not say in what way it should be done legally. The same is true for "regulate / control" (the current policy is governed by a ban), and therefore it must be both "legalization" and "regulation" explained the manner in which envisions the production and sales units shall be legally done.
As spokesperson for the People's Movement legitimate outlets for hashish and marijuana, Luhme, I believe that cannabis should be legal and regulated like alcohol, ie in legal outlets with age. How strict regulations are (age, hours of operation, number of outlets, etc.) depends on the parties' ideology and politics, and may change over time. A legalization as a medical scheme for a small group of sick people, is not going to stop the "war on drugs" and all the misery it brings with it (because most people will still commit a criminal act and buy from the illicit market ). It is also wrong that people should department stores in nyc have to medicalize itself, to avoid being criminals, department stores in nyc because they want to use an alternative drug to alcohol.
PIR Øystein department stores in nyc Sættem Middelthun Øyvind Nondal
V Siri Engesæth Mathias Fischer Jacob Hand Gardening Erlend Andreas Horn Tord Hustveit Valentine Brubak Marit Jahren Barsnes Krogsæter Prince Peter Riekeles Sveinung Rotevatn Ina Roll Spinnangr Trond Wathne department stores in nyc Tveiten Jørgen Aas
"This department stores in nyc debate is not whether one is for or against drugs, but about the way we deal with drug problem." Police are facing an impossible task if the goal of drug policy is zero tolerance. "" It is pointless to use police and punishment against sick people. Items suggests that punishment is an appropriate remedy. department stores in nyc "
Forsberg's comment to Rusmeldingen: "There are a lot of Norwegians who have tried it as a fairly meaningless catch-all category called illegal drugs or narcotics. I myself am one of them. SIRUS could already in 2003 tell us that over 1 million Europeans have tried cannabis. Despite department stores in nyc the fact that many of us have experience, there few people to break the silence and participate in the debate. There is no reason to medicalize or criminalize on a general basis.
When Parliament today writes that it is not well done that decriminalize the use and possession or legalization of drugs would reduce drug problems, there is an allegation is not evidence. When we as