Some guidance may be also carefully compared the same Gospels. rackhams And then we immediately not

Now turn to a deeper analysis of the gospel. We have already mentioned the evidence of it was written this time and a date for early approvals; Now look at the origins and veracity. Gospel with the emergence of interest neapslāpstošu studied almost since the very beginning of Christianity. Already in the second century, we see that the bishop of Hierapolis in Asia Minor Papijs gathered information on these and similar topics from previous generations of Christians - people who talked with the apostles themselves. Around 130 to 140th g. Papijs wrote five books (preserved in only a few other authors cited passages) entitled "An Exposition of the Oracles of the Lord," and he says in the introduction:
"But I will not dwell up with my own interpretation to reveal rackhams all, what ever I have learned from the elders, and remember well, proving they say the truth. Unlike most of his contemporaries, rackhams my nesajūsmina those who talk a lot, but those who teach the truth, as well as not those who repeat another prescribed commandments, but those who go to the law of the Lord entrusts faith and guided by Him who is the truth.
Also, unless I happened to encounter people rackhams who have met with the elders, I have an interview for what they said - that said, Andrew, Peter, Philip, Thomas and James, John and Matthew, like any of the disciples of Jesus; like everything rackhams you said Aristions and old John Lord or the apostles. Because I do not believe what I was able to get the books, I would have given more than alive, audible voice words ". [37]
Among other things from the elders and their companions, he received news of the gospel in the future; Now let's look at them. From that time to the present day people have searched for the answer to this question, both to the essential and nonessential testimony not only learn as much as possible about the gospel of correspondence, rackhams but also trying to get closer to what's behind them, learn everything you can about sources is based on the Gospels, which are brought to the present day. There is no doubt that such studies, the so-called "source criticism" is exciting. But the source of the Gospel and the hypothetical reconstruction of the research may prove to be too binding, and the researcher can not forget that the actual Gospel, which come to us first century literary form of work is necessarily more important than the apparent source of the tangible documents or anything because they long since ceased to exist, even if ever existed, while the Gospel there to this day. And we also keep in mind that this "source criticism", no matter how interesting it also would seem, in fact, far from offering such a convincing result rackhams as "text criticism" because allowing more probabilistic elements.
But if we know and count with the limitations inherent in such a text criticism, the study of the gospel have some value. If the previous chapter that the gospel was written time is in all respects correct, then it can be seen that the events described rackhams in the Gospel of fair events are separated by not very long period of time. If, however, sufficiently reliable to prove that these same articles in their entirety or in part is dependent on another historic documents, rackhams the truth of the Gospel story is even more convincing.
Some guidance may be also carefully compared the same Gospels. rackhams And then we immediately notice that the Gospels are divided into two groups, on the one hand, the first three, on the other hand - the fourth gospel of the kingdom. Later, back at the fourth gospel research, rackhams but for now let's look at the other three, the so-called "Synoptic Gospels" because they are organized synoptic; from this perspective, all three at the same time be seen. [38] There is no need for detailed studies to reveal that all three large amount of material is the same, for example, shows that 606 of the 661 articles in the gospel of Mark appears in Matthew's Gospel, as well as Mark's gospel Article 350 with slight modifications repeated in Luke. Or, formulating it differently, from 500 in 1068 Matthew articles containing material that is also found in Mark; or 350 of the 1149 Luke articles coincided with Mark's Gospel. So, there are only 31 Article in Mark, which is not parallel with either Matthew or Luke.
If we compare directly the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, we see that they both have around 250 Articles with the same material, which, in turn, are not found in Mark. The common material of expression is sometimes virtually identical for both Matthew and Luke, but sometimes significant rackhams differences appear. rackhams Left for about 33 article in Matthew, which contains rackhams only the gospel of this specific descriptions and conversations, just around 500 thereof Luke, who does not like the other gospels.
These facts are very easy to verify speculation begins when we try to explain them. Sometimes rackhams materials common to two or more "weather forecaster" is the word so identical that hard to call it coincidence. USA match this language or the identity of the last century is usually explained that Evans